A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

This is, apparently, God.
This is, apparently, God.

The 1980s were a watershed time for American movies studios. After the protracted collapse of the old studio system in the 40s and 50s necessitated a major overhaul of Hollywood’s entire production architecture, major studios spent the 60s and 70s establishing financial relationships with independent movie producers. Previously considered the lowest form of life on Earth, a rising generation of creative types proved instead that smaller films staring no one anybody had ever heard of could make major bank. All they needed as an idea, and a group of people who believed in that idea enough to see it put on screen.

The result? Well, we can see the result on any video store shelf: oodles of low-budget, indy films, no longer made so much as distributed by the major studios. Smaller companies, geared toward nothing but selling these pictures to theaters, sprung up like gravestones in the Crystal Lake Woods. One of them, founded in 1967 by distributors Michael Lynne and Robert Shaye, was named New Line.

New Line hobbled about for a few years, slinging foreign films to college theaters, and by the middle 70s it became adventurous enough to start financing its own films. In 1982 they made an R.D. Lang-inspired inversion of Halloween called Alone in the Dark. Nobody saw it, though the title was certainly good enough to steal. In 1983, they made Xtro, an E.T. rip-off if ever there was one. And in 1984, they contacted a notorious rape-revenge and crazed-hillbilly movie maker Wes Craven to make this. So I guess what they say is true and even a broken clock is right at least once a decade or so.


Our story begins in the small, American town of Springwood, Ohio, in the Year of Orwell. Except that’s a lie: we begin with one of the most effective, minimalist openings in modern horror: a pair of hands. We watch them attach five razor blades to an old leather glove as the pre-title credits play beneath the shrunken box that’s become our first window into the film’s world. Red titles rise from like a subconscious urge from the darkness as the hand fades out.

Cut to Tina (Amanda Wyss), a girl in a just-sheer-enough night gown, running through a darkened industrial complex persued by…some one… This, then, is her nightmare. She’s had a lot of them recently, all featuring the same imagery. Her mother tells her, “Tina, you gotta cut your fingernails, you gotta stop that dreamin’.” She shares them with her friends, Nancy (Heather Langenkamp) and Glen (Johnny motherfucking Depp!). Nancy confesses she’s been having eerily similar dreams: nightmares about a horribly-burnt man with razor blades for fingernails…

Not wanting to spend the night alone, Tina requests the pleasure of Nancy and Glen’s company…only to abandon them both once her boyfriend Rod (Nick Corri) arrives. The two retire upstairs to do what all teenagers in horror movies do: have sex and die. Glen and Nancy wisely refrain, despite being A Thing.

Brings a whole new meaning to "Reach for your dreams," eh?
Brings a whole new meaning to "Reach for your dreams," eh?

So, of course, Tina dies. But this is a horror film from the middle-80s. We all know what’s coming, but as comic books teach us, it’s the execution that counts. In a sequence that could’ve been drawn from a nightmare in it’s own right, Tina’s sliced apart by an unseen assassin who proceeds to redecorate the room in her blood. Rod, obviously scarred shitless, can only stand by, watch the carnage, and escape. He later confesses he thought the whole thing a bad dream…rather like the bought of nightmares he’s been having recently about a burned man in a dirty hat…

Given that it takes two to tang, Rod soon dies for his twin crimes of having sex and being an asshole…in a locked jail cell, no less. The police call it suicide. Nancy’s parents urge her to forget the whole thing…but nocturnal visits with the burned man only intensify. Nancy begins to suspect that the man with the claws is real, and somehow capable of killing across the boundaries between dreams the waking world. Nancy’s dream-self even manages to snatch the man’s hat off and brings it with her back to “reality.” It even has a name on the tag: Fred Krueger.

Poignantly, Nancy’s  mother needs several stiff drinks before she reveals Krueger’s origin. Old Fred murdered some twenty-odd kids before Nancy was born, but walked away from it all on a technicality. Mad with rage, a group of Springwood’s concerned parents banded together, tracked “Freddy” to an old factory, and burned the place to the ground. “Fred Krueger can’t get you know,” Nancy’s mom assures her. “Mommy killed him.”

Your weather tonight will be party dreamy with a chance of falling crucifixes.
Your weather tonight will be party dreamy with a chance of falling crucifixes.

Well you didn’t do a very good job of it, Mom. Free of all mortal encumbrance, Krueger’s become a superpowered phantom, invading the dreams of his killer’s children, hoping to make them pay in their progeny’s blood…and guess who’s next on the list?

You already knew all that, of course. In fact, you’d be hard pressed to find a kid who doesn’t instantly recognize Freddy…or, at the very least, his glove. Both murderer and weapon have become so ingrained in our culture subconscious and it’s hideously easy to see why. We’re all afraid of the Bogeyman, after all.

I know Freddy’s fraternity brother, Michael Myers, is usually given that title, but it’s a title Kruger is far more fit to wear. While Michael is the stalking, unstoppable, external threat…the kind suburban Americana seems to fear so much it’s been a handy chain politicians have yanked for generations… he is just that: external. It’s hard think of a place more internal, or integral, to humanity that our dreams.

Because of this, Nightmare on Elm Street leaks symbolism from ever orifice, and my dirty fedora’s off to writer/director Wes Craven. This idea is his excuse to go hog wild, combining every unsettling dream image his apparently-nightmare-addled mind could throw up into a hypothetical meta-nightmare: a collage of easily-recognizable human fears as potent today as it was when it first premiered. It’s all here: entrapment, helplessness, hidden-unseen threats…the creeping dread of inevitable mortality. All served to us up in a palpable nightmare stew by a director who could reasonably called visionary.

"Pardon me...have you heard the good news?"
"Pardon me...have you heard the good news?"

In the process, Craven also creates a hypothetical meta-Slasher film, stacking his bases with all the well-known sub-genre hits in the first twenty minutes. Teenagers gather at a central place, have sex, and die. Once that’s out of the way, Craven’s free to use a whodunit plot to disparage the collective parenting skills of Middle America’s Middle Class…for which I’ll eternally salute him. The self-righteousness, the distancing, the needless hiding of a sordid past…it all conspires to place Nancy in Mortal jeopardy and certainly kills her friends.

In that sense, the film’s a tragedy as American as apple pie and extra-judicial lynch mobs. Of course, no one wants to believe Nancy when she starts going on about homicidal ghosts, but this is the first “horror” movie since The Blob to really exploit the “kids-say-the-darnedest-things” obliviousness of American adulthood to full effect. You’d think this would be an all purpose tension generating device, but most film’s cock it up by not actually be tense. Here, Our Heroine is forced to face the fatally-human fact that we’ve got to sleep sometime…and her parent’s typically-dismissive ignorance and inability to believe them only exacerbates the already built-in tension.

I swear, no one's allowed to bathe in Horror films.
I swear, no one's allowed to bathe in Horror films.

We’ll start praising actors with Robert Englund. This is, after all, the role that will haunt him until he dies. Ironic, Fred Kruger being a ghost and all, no? Thankfully, Englund here shows us a depraved monster, the worst person in the world to wield this kind of power, who seems to delight in his victim’s fear as much as their blood. A sadomasochist with a god’s power, Englund nevertheless portrays him with credibility. He feels real enough to feel threatening, something the legion of Shape-imitators never manage.

In fact, Freddy’s obvious weakness lies in the amount of joy he takes in his protracted revenge. Like many a superpowered being before him, Freddy has a bad habit of forgetting about his own superpowers, preferring a more personal touch. The human hand, after all, is our oldest weapon, which I suppose was Craven’s whole point all along. Well, thanks for that uplifting message of hope, Wes.

Our other cast members start the film wooden, but end up winning me over by virtue of their ability to play extremes. Young Depp in particular moves well. Ditto with Corri and Wyss, though they have less time to develop beyond the level of Walking Target.

Rule breaker...we love you for it, dear.
Rule breaker...we love you for it, dear.

But I must save all my best praise for Heather Langenkamp. Though she beings the flick with all the emotion ADRed out of her dialogue, she gains what I can only describe as a thousand yard stare over the coruse of the film. By the end, you’ve been through so much with Nancy you can’t help but feel for her, since she’s pretty much the Final Girl after Tina and Rod check out. As a tragic protagonist she’s not exactly what you’d call “flawed.” Her only real flaw is ignorance, and for that I Blame the Parents…but in a universe of near-virtuous, one-note main characters Nancy’s ifntelligence and persistence shine through, making her my favorite Final Girl of all time.

By the end of the film, I’d believe she could stare down half the marines in Full Metal Jacket. It’s her ability to mix determination and fright into some combustable mixture of emotions – call it “determafright.” Or just call it Good. John Lovitz would call it “ACTING!” and its something all Final Girls must eventually fall back upon…but few manage it with the grace and continuity of performance the Langenkamp brings to her role.

Hmm . . . let me see . . . character’s you care about, a story you can get into (that’s merely sprinkled with cliches, instead of drowning in them) and a story that will scare the bejesus out of you. All of which is brought to life by talented artists who actually deserve to be called artists.

You may hate this movie for what it created (or helped create, considering wise-cracking maniacs are hardly unique). You may hate this movie because it gave Slasher movies the shot in the arm they needed to last through the rest of the 80s. But no matter what, don’t fault the movie for its progeny. A Nightmare on Elm Street is, and should remain, right up there with Halloween and Psycho as a great horror movie of the 20th century, certainly the best of the Slasher genre to date. Tauntingly written, well directed, crafted to scare you silly, only its low production values save it from perfection. Just go buy it already, before I go off and write a dissertation about it.



7 thoughts on “A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)”

  1. I never really got A Nightmare on Elm Street. It’s a shoddy-looking slasher film with a few tricks up its sleeve. Acting is pretty awful. Charles Bernstein’s synthesizer score is silly (especially when Nancy figures out that Glen is in trouble and runs down the stairs…) The end makes no sense and it turns into Home Alone. Yeah, I know Nightmare came first but still… I keep excepting Macaulay Culkin show up when the booby traps come into play.

    I think Dream Warriors is actually a superior film, more competenly made, better directed, and Angelo Badalamenti improves upon Bernstein’s work. It doesn’t succumb to the original film’s more glaring flaws.

    But my favourite Freddy Krueger/Craven film is New Nightmare. It’s a scary, imaginative, thought provoking meta-horror film that deals with the horror genre and the disturbing Freddy Krueger phenomenon. It’s more than just a Freddy film, it’s one of the best horror films ever made about horror films.

    1. Hell of it is, there’s really not that much to get. An ex-psych major made a horror movie that helped change the way people make horror movies. With Heather Langenkamp. And one should not underestimate the effect a young Heather Langenkamp had on horror fans of a certain age and persuasion…particularly if we love Final Girls enough to write comparative essays about their adventures. I hate to “well, actually” someone, but time and tide have convinced me that the end of the film is really a Beta version of Last House on the Left. Because (as far as I’m aware, having never sat all the way through The Hills Have Eyes) Wes Craven has had exactly two good ideas in his life: making Freddy a ghost in the Dream Time, and making a Final Girl smart enough to effectively fight back. This film is their monument and, for all its flaws, I love it for what it represents as much as (if not more than) for what it is.

      That said, I agree with everything you said. Especially your hatred of the synth score (though I reserve my hate for what Henry Manfredini did to his theme for Friday the 13th Part 3-D) and your preference for Dream Warriors, which I’ll get too once I make ya’all suffer through Freddy’s Revenge with me. But there’s a strange, intangible purity to the first film. It’s straight, supernatural exploi-(and sexploi-) tation, with none of the Odious Comic Relief that would go on to doom the series.

      With all that said, it all comes down to personal preference. And I agree with everything you said about New Nightmare. It’s one of my favorites as well, and by far the best self-aware horror movie of the 1990s. I thought as much back in the days when people still admitted to liking Scream and no one’s come anywhere close to equaling New Nightmare in the subsequent decades…Wes Craven least of all.

  2. Freddy Kreuger absolutely terrified me before I ever saw a Nightmare film. It was essentially a bed time spooky story told to me by my older sister (she would have been 12 in 1984, so I’m guessing she saw the original on video sometime in the 13-15 range) when she saw it and couldn’t sleep right for at least a month. Hell, even my Dad got into the act after *HE* saw and liked it (he preferred the original ending to the producers tacked on “it’s not ooovvvveerr!!!”) and told me about it (I’m guessing the spunky final girl who makes use of military booby traps is what did it).

    That kind of build-up hurt the film a bit for me, I think, and each additional bit of Freddy I got, like that Dokken video, or the bits and pieces I saw of 3-5 I saw on cable, and then the time I rented Part 6, of all things, to be my first encounter with the series in full, unedited form-really hurt the original for me, I think, which I didn’t see until later, and edited for TV when I did. So while I can enjoy the original film, and Dreamwarriors, to some extent, they just don’t have the impact on me that Halloween did. Maybe it’s the fact that I personally struggled with serious nightmares right up until high school (hell, I still get them sometimes), maybe it’s just over familiarity, I’m not sure. The impact of the idea and the relative quality of the Wes Craven helmed entries in the series can’t be doubted though.

    1. Over-hype and a surplus of expectation can kill a film faster than anything. I was lucky enough to live in a house without siblings, near a town with two video stores that managed to fill the gaps in each others catalogs quite well. On top of that, my parents turned their noses up at all non-Hitchcockian horror film, so I got to go into almost all of these films cold. But for the longest time, thanks to the vagaries of each video store’s ordering policy, I experienced the dubious pleasure of seeing these films piecemeal and out of order.

      Friday the 13th‘s my go-to example, just because it’s story sticks out. I caught the last ten minutes of it on a hotel television somewhere in Kansas, on the ass-end of a family summer vacation. As soon as we got home, I rushed to grab Part 3 and Part The Final Chapter. Having read some universal condemnation of Part 5 in a horror magazine somewhere (probably Fangoria, this being back in the days when they still hired honest writers) I skipped to Part 6 (no harm done) 7 (Mmmm….Tina Shepherd….*drool*) and 8 (doh!). Then and only then, after all that, did I manage to catch the original Friday on Joe Bob Briggs annual Halloween crap movie marathon. As you can imagine, the effect was…significantly lessened. I had to watch a lot of bad Italian movies before I could genuinely appreciate Friday the 13th Part One as it was meant to be appreciated.

      A little bit later (in the mid-90s, around Scream time) every video store in the country started running specials. “X number of titles for X number of dollars,” that kinda thing. For us it was “7 movies, 7 nights, 7 bucks.” Kabalists insists that seven is God’s number, and those trips certainly started to feel like my own little excursions into heaven. They allowed me to run marathons through these series, igniting the first sparks of uncomprehending rage that would eventually flare up and become the rants in these pages.

      All of which is to say Dream Warriors was my first, followed by Master and Child. (There’s a name for an 80s hair band in there somewhere. “Now in concert: Warriors, Master and Child!”) After that, this first Nightmare hit me like a brick bat. It was a revelation. “You mean there was a time when this series was actually….*gasp*…scary? Even…nightmarish? A time when Freddy was just ‘Fred’ and St. Heather could actually act?” I loved it from the moment I saw that, even if its conclusion was foregone.

      1. I think I managed to see Friday the 13th before I saw any of the sequels. I *think*. I sort of saw Halloween, but I really saw Part 4 and then Part 2 before I ever saw Part 1. This was mostly due to the magic of Saturday afternoon/Halloween TV showings, though I think I saw Part 4 with my aunt (a HUGE Halloween fan) and cousins on videotape.

        I think my “Halloween Horror Marathon” was probably your “$7 for 7 titles for 7 Nights” in terms of movie fandom development. It’s where I really learned to love Hammer and Universal horror and where I snuck peaks at newer stuff, too.

        1. Bingo. There seems to be a real generational and/or socio-economic gap between those of us who had Big City TV Station access and those who didn’t. If I were half the mad scientist I pretend to be, I’d gather a representative sample of nerds and begin running surveys. I’ve always wondered how this gap effects patterns of fandom. The influence of network TV Saturday Afternoon Movies on Western kaiju fandom, for example, is obvious and deeply felt.

          1. Honestly, had I different older siblings and aunts, I’d have missed all of this stuff. In my case, at least, it was very generational. I’d love to see some scientific surveying of the fandom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *